Weird Studies/Pretentiousness

06 Apr 2024 - 12 May 2024
Open in Logseq
    • Pre

      • Pre-episode thoughts: I'm of two minds. I think I understand the defense of pretentiousness they are going to be making. OTOH there is an awful lot of sheer bullshit around and detecting that is important.
      • I grew up on MAD Magazine and the general jewish-comic-skeptic ethos of bursting the inflated balloons of culture. It's a huge part of my general background. But I have to admit that that sort of cleverness can curdle into narrow-mindedness.
    • Post

    • I enjoyed this episode a lot, I think it really highlighted an important idea, one that will be resonating with me for a long time. There is so much to be said about the role of pretense in art and in the ordinary rounds of daily life.
    • The major point is that pretense is a fundamental act, necessary to the function of the artist, and sneerering critics who accuse an artist of pretentiousness are assholes and exclusionists, saying that some people have a right to certain ideas while others do not.
      • The toxic side of our insistence on authenticity, of the need to unmask everything. As if that were possible.
      • Aspiration: The Agency of Becoming not exactly about pretentiousness (the word does not appear) but does talk about pretension and its role in achieving self-transformative goals.
      • Henry Jenkins's work on fan cultures is one of the most effective works of anti-pretension I've ever encountered. It really undermined or at least exposed a rich vein of snobbery in my own thinking.
      • That line from Vonneguts' Mother Night: “We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful about what we pretend to be.”
    • Brian Eno declared he would ignore accusations
    • In Defense of Pretentiousness
      • Fox returns more than once to a remark by Brian Eno, who wrote that at one point he “decided to turn ‘pretentious’ into a compliment”: “The common assumption is that there are ‘real’ people and there are others who are pretending to be something they’re not. There is also an assumption that there’s something morally wrong with pretending. My assumptions about culture as a place where you can take psychological risks without incurring physical penalties make me think that pretending is the most important thing we do. It’s the way we make our thought experiments, find out what it would be like to be otherwise.”
    • PFs theory of his approach to academia: look into something a little beyohnd your reach, and imagine yourself being the kind of person who could know the thing. Impersonate that person
      • this is very like Minsky imprimer theory, just with different aspects emphasized. Or maybe not. You are supposed to think of imprimers as toolboxes of techniques. What would x do? Whereas the pretension game is more; model your actions on this person. What is it like to be x?
        • No, that's not quite it either. Acting like you are x is different from thinking about what it is to be like x. The latter is mere fantasy, the former is more like committing to a bit.
    • Pretension (or whatever) is the faculty as acting as if it were so: one of the most treasured faculties of academic and intellectual life.
    • JFM building a time machine as a kid.
    • Some fulminations against materialism but I realize what they mean by this is not what I mean (not sure who is more standard). They mean it in a kind of dour Marxist mode, that is, it is an emphasis on grim reality and a negation of the imaginal. This is not what materialism means to a physicist. It's more what I call gradgrindism.
      • So, I want to say: no no no, the material is not the enemy of the imaginal, far from it.
        • BUT: maybe I'm wrong. The techno-scientific-capitalism world sure seems that way!