About
    • AMMDI is an open-notebook hypertext writing experiment, authored by Mike Travers aka mtraven. It's a work in progress and some parts are more polished than others. Comments welcome! More.
Search
Full
Incoming links
Twin Pages

Stances, a Catalog

30 Oct 2021 02:15 - 07 Sep 2022 03:40
Open in Logseq
    • Some useful stances

      • See stance. The idea of this page is to catalog some of the stances I find myself occasionally assuming, or at aspiring to assuming, or noticing other people assuming. I certainly have no hope of providing an exhaustive set of all stances! My nebulous definition of stance admits too many different kinds of things.
    • Designer Stance

      • Design Thinking is unfortunately a trendy idea in the business world (or was, probably long past its peak by now). That doesn't mean it isn't a really valuable stance! I'm not going to critique design thinking because I'm almost entirely [ok who the fuck cares]
      • I was exposed to a really compelling version of design stance at an early age, since I somehow discovered Victor Papanek's Design for the Real World at the public library (quite possible heard about it via Whole Earth Catalog). This was an eye-opening and intense book, as Papanek excoriated the profession of industrial design for spending its energies on trivial things while the real problems of the world are begging for creative solutions. At the time I read it I probably had no idea that there was such a thing as industrial design, but now I not only was aware, I had strong opinions about it.
      • The essence of design is approaching a situation analytically nd creatively and incorporating all the context (cost, use, evolution in time, semantic signalling, )
      • Distinguished from Hacker Stance because that generally focuses on a very narrow technical system; the designer has to take on every aspect of a human reality.
      • SB deserves a shoutout (he has his own stance now below). Fuller, Papanek
      • Distinguish from Dennett Design Stance.
    • Perserverance stance

      • aka the sunk-cost fallacy
      • Maybe a meta-stance. Keep doing what you are doing, no matter how futile it seems
      • Marvin talks about the dumbness of the try-harder stories.
    • Historical hope stance

      • The arc of the Moral Universe is Long, but it bends towards justice
        • – Martin Luther King Jr, quoting the original source, 19th century clergyman Theodore Parker
      • Faith in the inevitability of a better world certainly is a powerful tool to sustain action. Any progressive activist has to have a bit of this stance in them, otherwise they'd give up. It requires a certain kind of faith.
    • TANJ Stance

      • Tanj! was a curse used in the fictional universe of Larry Niven, which I absorbed pretty throughly in my youth. It stands for There Ain't No Justice, aka shit happens, or the biblical "he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good,: and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust." (Matthew 5:45).
      • See Tourniquet stance
      • See Justice stance
    • Magic Stance

      • I'm not sure how to characterize this, although RAW and Crowley are obvious exemplars.
      • It's radically skeptical and empirical but in a way wholly different from science and rationality. What works for you?
      • Writers on magic spend a lot of time explicitly trying to convey the nature of the magical stance. That is to say, as a field it is as reflexive (aka navel gazing) as academic literary theory, maybe more so. I think you could almost say that it consists of a particular kind of stance, the weird paraphrenalia is all in the service of a larger goal, which is something like "aligning your personal will with that of God".
      • MotT too involves detailed stance-work, his "Christian Hermeticism" is more than a body of knowledge, it is a particular attitude towards knowledge.
    • Service stance

      • This is very simple, not a subculture or lifestyle choice, just a kind of trick you can always use to make yourself actually good. In any situation ask yourself "how can I be of service?". End of story, too fucking simple, and what if I get taken advantage of thereby....
    • Consultant-guru Stance

      • VGR, Tiago – I don't quite get this one, but I have been at least noticing it.
      • It involves a certain limited form of arrogance – that your mind is so great, its opinion on random things is valuable.
      • Hm, Dylan Smedar maybe falls in this camp.
      • IOW, I am somewhat envious of those who are arrogant to offer themselves up as viewpoints-for-hire (hm, and maybe this is a metastance as well)
    • Comedy Stance

      • [maybe this is just irony stance drawn out into a performance]
    • Irony Stance

      • Kierkegaard, etc.
      • Praise of Irony book.
      • (simpsons on the exhaustion of irony)
    • Growth Stance

      • Better known as growth mindset, this has become kind of a joke but I still find it the one of the most admirable things to come out of the rationalist community.
    • Buddha Stance

      • Oy vey!
      • Link to Chapman
      • Manjusri then asked further, “Noble sir, if a bodhisattva considers all living beings in such a way, how does he generate the great love3 toward them?”
      • Vimalakirti replied, “Manjusri, when a bodhisattva considers all living beings in this way, he thinks: ‘Just as I have realized the Dharma, so should I teach it to living beings.’4 Thereby, he generates the love that is truly a refuge for all living beings; the love that is peaceful because free of grasping; the love that is not
      • feverish, because free of passions; the love that accords with reality because it is equanimous in all three times; the love that is without conflict because free of the violence of the passions; the love that is nondual because it is involved neither with the external.nor with the internal; the love that is imperturbable because totally ultimate.
      • “Thereby he generates the love that is firm, its high resolve unbreakable, like a diamond; the love that is pure, purified in its intrinsic nature; the love that is even, its aspirations being equal; the saint’slove that has eliminated its enemy;5 the bodhisattva’s love that continuously develops living beings; the T athágata’s love that understands reality; the Buddha’s love that causes living beings to awaken from their sleep; the love that is spontaneous because it is fully enlightened spontaneously;6 the love that is enlightenment because it is unity of experience; the love that has no presumption because it has eliminated attachment and aversion; the love that is great compassion because it infuses the Mahayana with radiance; the love that is never exhausted because it acknowledges voidness and selflessness; the love that is giving because it bestows the gift of Dharma free of the tight fist of a bad teacher; the love that is morality because it improves immoral living beings; the love that is tolerance because it protects both self and others; the love that is effort because it takes responsibility for all living beings; the love that is contemplation because it refrains from indulgence in tastes; the love that is wisdom because it causes attainment at the proper time;7 the love that is liberative technique because it shows the way everywhere; the love that is without formality because it is pure in motivation; the love that is without deviation because it acts from decisive motivation; the love that is high resolve because it is without passions; the love that is without deceit because it is not artificial; the love that is happiness because it introduces living beings to the happiness of the Buddha. Such, Mañjusrí, is the great love of a bodhisattva.”
    • Nongrasping stance

      • He who binds himself to a joy Does the winged life destroy He who kisses the joy as it files Lives in eternity's sunrise
    • Teacher Stance

      • Don't know if I have much to say but I really enjoyed teaching that Python class! Some quality of passing along a gift…
    • Aesthetic/hedonic stance

      • Not quite "if it feels good, do it", more like, let yourself be guided by the feeling of what's right. Develop a sense for it.
      • [sorry high as fuck right now, trying to describe something]
    • Parent stance

      • And child stance, although that is.a weird one in that it is the one stance you can take without effort or training.
      • Games People Play and Transactional Analysis spun up a lot of theories based on the pop-Freudian division of self into Parent, Adult, and Child.
    • Mr. Fixit

      • This is the poseur version of the hacker stance or design stance, kind of. Or the delusional version, the idea that hey, here's a problem, let's just put our mind and will to it and fix it!
      • But some problems can't be fixed. One must adapt, which is different.
      • See Hacker Stance, Doctor Stance.
    • Rage stance

      • bigbaby.gif
        • [i think this is missing some panels!]
      • Not sure this one is really all that useful!
      • The left likes this one, which is one of the things that makes it hard for me to identify with the left. Not that I don't have plenty of rage, but I don't think it's done me any good, whether or not is justified or not, whether it is personal or political. I'm trying to be less rage-y.
      • [ nuna story as deliciously justified rage ]
      • vs Stoic stance
      • Maybe ref Sloterdijk
      • Burrough's Portugese Mooch. Must be some other good literary interpretations (Loki in Sandman? But too fucking obvious about it). Rage is not very interesting unless it carries a risk of real violence along with it. Saleri. Malkovich in Burn After Reading, a very wimpy, silly sort of rage but real enough.
    • Compassion stance

      • This is a key element of Buddhism, which has the idea that selves are non-existant and one should feel great compassion for all of them.
      • [Vimalakirti passage about how one generates compassion for all living beings]
      • This isn't sentimental, pitying, do-gooder liberal compassion (not that there's anything wrong with that – but it doesn't interest me), That is still based on atomized individuals who are sources or sinks of pity. Buddhist compassion is more of a field of liberation and joy, that seeks to spread itself to the unliberated.
    • "put a tourniquet on it"

      • See stoic stance, although this is more specific
      • I am one of those people who have memorized entire Coen brothers movies, but I will spare you The Big Lebowski riffs (although come on, how many other works of pop culture reference nihilism by name?)
    • Aquarian stance

      • See my Moment of Totality post
    • Incel stance, feminist stance, trans stance

      • Oy vey
    • Vitalist stance

      • Alexander, Blake maybe
      • Too intellectual for the list?
    • Some boring professional stances

      • Boring in the sense that everybody is sort of aware of these because they are attached to specific professions:
        • acquisitive stance
        • science stance
        • artist stance
      • Etc. To the extent these are professions, they are all marked with scoring systems: a good financier has more money than a mediocre one, a good artist ahs more attention, a good scientist has a higher count of influential publications. (I got this trope from Sloterdijk).
    • Artist stance

      • This sounds extremely lame when decoupled from being an actual artist. But – viewing every small act you do as an act of creation, you are at minimum creating the conditions in your mind. And creating in the same way an artist does, by letting yourself be driven by powers larger than oneself. And taking a keen notice of the esthetic qualities of things (which means in practice being anti-quantitative)
      • Related: [BROKEN LINK: hedonic stance]
    • Science stance

      • but these are geniuses, and stance is very distinct from genius. (stances are democratic, genius is aristocratic)
    • The Stewart Brand stance

      • comprehensive designer
      • we are as gods and might as well get good at it
      • access to tools
    • prankster stance

      • "you're either on the bus or off the bus"
      • "never trust a prankster"
      • Something downright metaphysical going on there; not sure I can articulate it. Shamanistic – the only available authenticity is a kind of spiritual fakery.
    • The Bruce Sterling stance

      • (also a founder of a movement and sort-of a cultural attitude)
      • Hm, what did I have in mind for this? Texas-globalist-hipster...
    • VGR stances?

      • He's got dozens probably
    • No Fucks Left to Give

    • La Resistance Lives On

      • Political resistance is a stance. In the present time, everybody is kind of feeling out what this means. What is it that demands resistance? There are some ugly, ugly things out there (fascism and racism) that demand resistance, or at least a show of resistance.
      • I'm a leftist and the thing that demands resistance for me is fascism. My warning-detectors for fascism are set high, although as it turns out I was quite right about it. But our local American fascism is not at the stage of a shooting war and probably won't be, so what does resistance even mean? I wrote some blog posts and tweets trying to get people stirred up, and went to some protests. Big freakin' deal.
      • The stance aspect of this is interesting; I feel like there's sort of a collective effort to get the soft middle-class people we all are to at least get the idea of physical resistence in mind. To realize that violence is quite real and our society is based on it, even if it's been pretty much moved out of sight.
      • Note that rightwingers have their own version of this stance – they gather in groups to complain about perceived oppression and fantasize about violence, although they are more likely to have real guns and cross the border into real action.
      • The fantasy elements are strong in both cases. I can't begin to unpack how much my imagination is ruled by images of Nazi terror – from both history and popular culture. And the notion that fat lazy Americans on either side are about to gird their loins for existential war is frankly laughable.
      • [link to kristor but nah]
    • Scholar stance

      • ref The Independent Scholar's handbook, which was a revelation to me (th)
    • Special Snowflake

      • This is something @vgr has tilted against.
      • [private definitely] I feel fucking guilty of this one, I feel like a special snowflake, who never fit into any normal niche or rules. I must make my own rules! I must write long texts where I humorously dissect my own specialness!

Comments