fictionalism
11 May 2024 - 10 Oct 2026
- Philosophy can make any idea boring
- Oddly Dennett does not seem to be considered a fictionalist?
- Seems roughly compatible with Buddhist nondualism?
- But I find it so exciting, this idea that all knowledge is fictional, a construct, loosely based on something underlying that we can never actually grasp or talk about. It's liberating – ideas no longer imprison us. It's scary – ideas no longer protect us.
- It elevates the human mind – we are all creators of our own stories, like it or not. We might not be terribly bold or original, but we have to spin fictions for ourselves that we then inhabit. Sometimes collectively, sometimes individually (although nobody really does it on their own).
- Why can't we get better at it? To riff off of Stewart Brand's "we are as gods so we might as well get good at it". Fictionalism posits that we are like gods in a very specific way – we are creators. All of us, not just the arteests, although maybe they are better at it than normal folks. We are constantly spinning stories for ourselves, of ourselves. It's what we do! Fortunately we are fascinating to ourselves, otherwise it would be extremely boring.
- Fictional does not trivial or dismissable – fictions are very important to us. Fictional also, and this is a bit harder to understand, does not mean unreal. Fictions can have effects, therefore they are real, in some different way than your typical physob. See "God" ≡ God.